domingo, 6 de septiembre de 2009

How Did Economists Get It So Wrong?

Por mucho tiempo la gente se ha preguntado cómo, con tantos economistas, esta profesión fui incapaz de prever el colapso de la economía mundial, y en particular, del capitalismo salvaje que ha representado el neoliberalismo en todas sus variantes. Paul Krugman ofrece una lección magistral en este artículo titulado "How Did Economists Get It So Wrong?".
I. MISTAKING BEAUTY FOR TRUTH It’s hard to believe now, but not long ago economists were congratulating themselves over the success of their field. Those successes — or so they believed — were both theoretical and practical, leading to a golden era for the profession. On the theoretical side, they thought that they had resolved their internal disputes. Thus, in a 2008 paper titled “The State of Macro” (that is, macroeconomics, the study of big-picture issues like recessions), Olivier Blanchard of M.I.T., now the chief economist at the International Monetary Fund, declared that “the state of macro is good.” The battles of yesteryear, he said, were over, and there had been a “broad convergence of vision.” And in the real world, economists believed they had things under control: the “central problem of depression-prevention has been solved,” declared Robert Lucas of the University of Chicago in his 2003 presidential address to the American Economic Association. In 2004, Ben Bernanke, a former Princeton professor who is now the chairman of the Federal Reserve Board, celebrated the Great Moderation in economic performance over the previous two decades, which he attributed in part to improved economic policy making.

Last year, everything came apart.
(continuar)

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario